<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breast Cancer Research: Where We Are and Where We Should Be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:06:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose Eneri</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose Eneri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>Why does the cancer industry push for early detection?  The answer is simple.  Let&#039;s say you have a cancer that inevitably kills you in 10 years.  If that cancer is detected in year 7, your survival is 3 years.  But, if that cancer is detected in year 4, all of a sudden your survival time has doubled from 3 years to 6 years.  But, your actual survival from the time the cancer started has not changed.  You still die in year 10, except that now you live for 6 years (instead of 3) knowing you have cancer and getting futile, harmful, painful and costly treatments.  The cancer industry has raked in big bucks for your treatments and gets big donations based on the false &quot;progress&quot; of a doubling of survival time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the cancer industry push for early detection?  The answer is simple.  Let&#8217;s say you have a cancer that inevitably kills you in 10 years.  If that cancer is detected in year 7, your survival is 3 years.  But, if that cancer is detected in year 4, all of a sudden your survival time has doubled from 3 years to 6 years.  But, your actual survival from the time the cancer started has not changed.  You still die in year 10, except that now you live for 6 years (instead of 3) knowing you have cancer and getting futile, harmful, painful and costly treatments.  The cancer industry has raked in big bucks for your treatments and gets big donations based on the false &#8220;progress&#8221; of a doubling of survival time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Kearney</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Kearney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>The Cancer Society and most foundations toward the &quot;cure&quot; for cancer is fraud. How can we ask for a cure from a multi billion dollar industry who wants to continue bringing in the big bucks. They dont want to find a cure, its all about profit. There has been amazing treatment stories from homeopathic medicine that helps with true prevention. They on the other hand, support toxic medications and food with perservatives in it. They tell women to get mammograms which cause cancer....why can&#039;t they just use themography which senses heat to find cancer and causes no harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cancer Society and most foundations toward the &#8220;cure&#8221; for cancer is fraud. How can we ask for a cure from a multi billion dollar industry who wants to continue bringing in the big bucks. They dont want to find a cure, its all about profit. There has been amazing treatment stories from homeopathic medicine that helps with true prevention. They on the other hand, support toxic medications and food with perservatives in it. They tell women to get mammograms which cause cancer&#8230;.why can&#8217;t they just use themography which senses heat to find cancer and causes no harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev Jo</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this blog and information.

What they do not tell us is that mammograms cause breast, thyroid and other cancers, as well as heart damage. If you ask them, they lie. One mammogram or x-ray is NOT like a plane trip. John Gofman, one of the original nuclear physicists says it&#039;s like a thousand plane trips or more. I told this to a friend who&#039;s father is a famous oncologist, expecting her to protest. She simply said, &quot;I know. All doctors know this.&quot;

The &quot;Breast Health&quot; industry is a huge business. They make money from cancer. Of course they sell cancer-causing perfume and push cancer-causing mammograms. (And actually heart disease kills more women, so how many have died from hearts damaged by mammograms? Why does almost no one talk about this?)  They discourage us from having safe thermograms, and of course insurance does not pay for them.

After TV doctor Oz said he believed that most thyroid cancer is caused by mammograms, the horrible pink breast clinic I was forced to go to had statements posted about how that was not true. I was given no thyroid protection and only given other protection during the mammogram when I insisted. That place is so obviously about money, and so disturbing. They pretend to be a community place, and even have cancer survivors volunteering. 

I just had surgery for possible ovarian cancer (I was fine, but ovary and uterus are gone now.)  My gynecological oncologist said she would not do the surgery she recommended if I did not get another mammogram. I had sworn never to again. 

So if metastases are a suspicion, what do they do?  CAT scans cause even more cancer. A Physician&#039;s Assistant recently told me that he was taught at Stanford Medical school that 20% of all US cancers are now caused by CAT scans alone!!!  When I told a doctor that, she refused to believe it. But he had no reason at all to lie. And Stanford Medical school?  Why is this not common knowledge?  Money.

It is very hard to say no to doctors. They terrify and intimidate. Do they tell cancer patients that they lie about &quot;cure&quot; rates for chemotherapy and radiation?  Do they tell you they cause cancer, as well as severe damage, from brain injury to neuropathy to hearing loss and more?  A friend who just finished chemo for breast cancer was told she was cured by her oncologist. That is criminal. Usually they wait 5 years. And then the secondary cancers appear from the &quot;treatment,&quot; but are not recorded in the statistics. 

Another friend who had two separate rare and fast-growing cancers, survived with surgery, alternative methods, and by saying no to radiation, chemotherapy and CAT scans. She says that after the 5 year mark, she saw every woman in her cancer support group get secondary cancers from the radiation and chemo. But they are not included in the statistics. Her surgeons had been incredibly cruel to her to try to bully her into those &quot;treatments,&quot; but she survived, 18 years, and 8 years later (from clear cell adenocarcinoma of the uterus and a rare colon cancer.)

It is VERY hard to say no to doctors without support. My friend&#039;s doctors did NOT want to know what alternative means she used to survive, Her survival is not recorded or in any statistics. She is available to women who want to cal her to get support.

Please spread the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this blog and information.</p>
<p>What they do not tell us is that mammograms cause breast, thyroid and other cancers, as well as heart damage. If you ask them, they lie. One mammogram or x-ray is NOT like a plane trip. John Gofman, one of the original nuclear physicists says it&#8217;s like a thousand plane trips or more. I told this to a friend who&#8217;s father is a famous oncologist, expecting her to protest. She simply said, &#8220;I know. All doctors know this.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;Breast Health&#8221; industry is a huge business. They make money from cancer. Of course they sell cancer-causing perfume and push cancer-causing mammograms. (And actually heart disease kills more women, so how many have died from hearts damaged by mammograms? Why does almost no one talk about this?)  They discourage us from having safe thermograms, and of course insurance does not pay for them.</p>
<p>After TV doctor Oz said he believed that most thyroid cancer is caused by mammograms, the horrible pink breast clinic I was forced to go to had statements posted about how that was not true. I was given no thyroid protection and only given other protection during the mammogram when I insisted. That place is so obviously about money, and so disturbing. They pretend to be a community place, and even have cancer survivors volunteering. </p>
<p>I just had surgery for possible ovarian cancer (I was fine, but ovary and uterus are gone now.)  My gynecological oncologist said she would not do the surgery she recommended if I did not get another mammogram. I had sworn never to again. </p>
<p>So if metastases are a suspicion, what do they do?  CAT scans cause even more cancer. A Physician&#8217;s Assistant recently told me that he was taught at Stanford Medical school that 20% of all US cancers are now caused by CAT scans alone!!!  When I told a doctor that, she refused to believe it. But he had no reason at all to lie. And Stanford Medical school?  Why is this not common knowledge?  Money.</p>
<p>It is very hard to say no to doctors. They terrify and intimidate. Do they tell cancer patients that they lie about &#8220;cure&#8221; rates for chemotherapy and radiation?  Do they tell you they cause cancer, as well as severe damage, from brain injury to neuropathy to hearing loss and more?  A friend who just finished chemo for breast cancer was told she was cured by her oncologist. That is criminal. Usually they wait 5 years. And then the secondary cancers appear from the &#8220;treatment,&#8221; but are not recorded in the statistics. </p>
<p>Another friend who had two separate rare and fast-growing cancers, survived with surgery, alternative methods, and by saying no to radiation, chemotherapy and CAT scans. She says that after the 5 year mark, she saw every woman in her cancer support group get secondary cancers from the radiation and chemo. But they are not included in the statistics. Her surgeons had been incredibly cruel to her to try to bully her into those &#8220;treatments,&#8221; but she survived, 18 years, and 8 years later (from clear cell adenocarcinoma of the uterus and a rare colon cancer.)</p>
<p>It is VERY hard to say no to doctors without support. My friend&#8217;s doctors did NOT want to know what alternative means she used to survive, Her survival is not recorded or in any statistics. She is available to women who want to cal her to get support.</p>
<p>Please spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryant Dunetz</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryant Dunetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>Having been the care giver to my wife battling MBC and now devoted to building and supporting mbc clinical trials over the last several years I remain optimistic, notwithstanding the complexity of the disease, that the science and biology advances coupled with the pipeline of new drugs will begin to show meaningful progress in the treatment of suffering patients. One impediment that I have found is accruing patients to participate in mbc trials which is essential to accelerate progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been the care giver to my wife battling MBC and now devoted to building and supporting mbc clinical trials over the last several years I remain optimistic, notwithstanding the complexity of the disease, that the science and biology advances coupled with the pipeline of new drugs will begin to show meaningful progress in the treatment of suffering patients. One impediment that I have found is accruing patients to participate in mbc trials which is essential to accelerate progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin in Texas</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for the excellent article.  I am one of those who are in that 30% group and would love to know why so many of us are still dying of metastatic breast cancer.   I wonder what it will take for this situation to change.  My initial breast cancer diagnosis was supposedly caught early when I was 32 years old.  Yet ten years later I was caught off guard by a diagnosis of metastatic disease.   Catching it early does not ensure cure.  For that I am living proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for the excellent article.  I am one of those who are in that 30% group and would love to know why so many of us are still dying of metastatic breast cancer.   I wonder what it will take for this situation to change.  My initial breast cancer diagnosis was supposedly caught early when I was 32 years old.  Yet ten years later I was caught off guard by a diagnosis of metastatic disease.   Catching it early does not ensure cure.  For that I am living proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caitlin</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for your comment, Janice. We are inspired by your passion! Two great places to start are www.metavivor.org and www.mbcn.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for your comment, Janice. We are inspired by your passion! Two great places to start are <a href="http://www.metavivor.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.metavivor.org</a> and <a href="http://www.mbcn.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.mbcn.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>Excellent article, thanks!

I&#039;d  like to know more!  What needs to get funded but is not?  

We need to raise these funds and get the research funded!

Can there be a central website that lists projects that cannot get the funding they need? 

Women have been powerful to get the Pink going... we can be just as powerful at changing the focus to be on research for a CURE for cancers, metastatic and otherwise.

-Janice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article, thanks!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d  like to know more!  What needs to get funded but is not?  </p>
<p>We need to raise these funds and get the research funded!</p>
<p>Can there be a central website that lists projects that cannot get the funding they need? </p>
<p>Women have been powerful to get the Pink going&#8230; we can be just as powerful at changing the focus to be on research for a CURE for cancers, metastatic and otherwise.</p>
<p>-Janice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musa Mayer</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Musa Mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>Excellent article!  I agree on every point but one:  The National Breast Cancer Coalition  has indeed devoted energy to working on a preventive vaccine, but that is only one of their two major initiatives.  The other is the prevention of metastasis.  NBCC convened a Summit this summer comprised of advocates and scientists whose sole research focus was on metastatic breast cancer, with many of the top minds in the field, like Pat Steeg, Danny Welch and Suzanne Fuqua.  Only through a scientific understanding of metastatic cancer itself, including dormancy, the micro-environment and the role that stem cells may play--as well as other under-researched areas--will we finally begin to effectively tackle the form of the disease that is actually responsible for those 40,000 deaths.  Our goal is to end deaths from breast cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article!  I agree on every point but one:  The National Breast Cancer Coalition  has indeed devoted energy to working on a preventive vaccine, but that is only one of their two major initiatives.  The other is the prevention of metastasis.  NBCC convened a Summit this summer comprised of advocates and scientists whose sole research focus was on metastatic breast cancer, with many of the top minds in the field, like Pat Steeg, Danny Welch and Suzanne Fuqua.  Only through a scientific understanding of metastatic cancer itself, including dormancy, the micro-environment and the role that stem cells may play&#8211;as well as other under-researched areas&#8211;will we finally begin to effectively tackle the form of the disease that is actually responsible for those 40,000 deaths.  Our goal is to end deaths from breast cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Fiessi</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Fiessi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>My mom died of Metastatic Breast Cancer and I never hear of any research being done. I think detection and prevention are fine goals but people still die from all cancers not just breast cancer. Since October is pinkwashing month, the other cancers don&#039;t get a chance to tell there story. Pinkwashing is terrible and should be stopped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mom died of Metastatic Breast Cancer and I never hear of any research being done. I think detection and prevention are fine goals but people still die from all cancers not just breast cancer. Since October is pinkwashing month, the other cancers don&#8217;t get a chance to tell there story. Pinkwashing is terrible and should be stopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Griffin</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>You have nailed it! Thank you for this well-written article.  It is so essential that research is allocated to Metastatic Breast Cancer. Having lost 2 friends at young ages, I find that investing in  awareness doesn&#039;t make a real impact. We need answers and more of a cure than early detection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have nailed it! Thank you for this well-written article.  It is so essential that research is allocated to Metastatic Breast Cancer. Having lost 2 friends at young ages, I find that investing in  awareness doesn&#8217;t make a real impact. We need answers and more of a cure than early detection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this concise article.  It drives me crazy that they can blithely write off 30% of the BC population.  As long as the myth that nothing can be done to stop metastatic disease persists it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this concise article.  It drives me crazy that they can blithely write off 30% of the BC population.  As long as the myth that nothing can be done to stop metastatic disease persists it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy Wood</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 04:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been &quot;cancer challenged&quot; -- and yet I have thought in terms of curing cancer as the end goal rather than thinking in terms of that means being able to cure cancers that have metastasized!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been &#8220;cancer challenged&#8221; &#8212; and yet I have thought in terms of curing cancer as the end goal rather than thinking in terms of that means being able to cure cancers that have metastasized!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 02:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>I first stumbled upon BCA&#039;s website several years ago because of my frustration with the blind eye the breast cancer &quot;society&quot; seems to turn to metastatic breast cancer. Like Dee, I also have a stage 4 sister, and I am glad I have found people willing to speak up. Even harder than trying to take on a group-think mob is trying to take on a group-think mob of mainly well-intentioned people (as I see the Komen supporter base), but it is a challenge worth rising to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first stumbled upon BCA&#8217;s website several years ago because of my frustration with the blind eye the breast cancer &#8220;society&#8221; seems to turn to metastatic breast cancer. Like Dee, I also have a stage 4 sister, and I am glad I have found people willing to speak up. Even harder than trying to take on a group-think mob is trying to take on a group-think mob of mainly well-intentioned people (as I see the Komen supporter base), but it is a challenge worth rising to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>My sister has Stage 4 breast cancer, and I really try not think about what it could mean for her. I don&#039;t understand why women who are &quot;aware&quot; have to keep dying from this disease. There certainly should be more money dedicated to the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister has Stage 4 breast cancer, and I really try not think about what it could mean for her. I don&#8217;t understand why women who are &#8220;aware&#8221; have to keep dying from this disease. There certainly should be more money dedicated to the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis Evans</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>I never really understood why women were dying of breast cancer.  Everything I knew had to do with early detection, removal of lump or breast, or BRACA.  I don&#039;t think the general public understands that metastasis can happen to anyone after surgery.  More information needs to be available, other than &quot;check for lumps&quot;.  This is the scary part of having breast cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never really understood why women were dying of breast cancer.  Everything I knew had to do with early detection, removal of lump or breast, or BRACA.  I don&#8217;t think the general public understands that metastasis can happen to anyone after surgery.  More information needs to be available, other than &#8220;check for lumps&#8221;.  This is the scary part of having breast cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Ribbon Blues</title>
		<link>http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772&#038;cpage=1#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Ribbon Blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>Thank you for bringing this information to light! Metastasis has fallen into the limelight of breast cancer awareness, yet it is wholly responsible for breast cancer deaths. It is also crucial to note that the prevention research that is done is primarily focused on individual behaviors and lifestyle factors rather than environmental exposures. Stopping breast cancer before it starts and reducing mortality from the disease must be the new priorities. The typical awareness campaign isn&#039;t cutting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for bringing this information to light! Metastasis has fallen into the limelight of breast cancer awareness, yet it is wholly responsible for breast cancer deaths. It is also crucial to note that the prevention research that is done is primarily focused on individual behaviors and lifestyle factors rather than environmental exposures. Stopping breast cancer before it starts and reducing mortality from the disease must be the new priorities. The typical awareness campaign isn&#8217;t cutting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
